Category: Archive

A recently published study found that over time, children from low-income families who participated in after-school programs were reading at a higher level than peers who were not.
Meanwhile, one teacher complains in USA Today that heavy textbooks featuring abridged, bland, and monolithic writing are ruining the joy of reading for young people.

Frustrated by unresponsive school officials, a high school student used her camera phone to expose to health authorities the roach and rodent problems in her home economics class, WAFF.com reports.

New York-based Girls Write Now and Los Angeles-based WriteGirl match professional women writers with teenage girls who love writing, the Christian Science Monitor reports.

Unlike most articles about teen-produced media, this Washington Post piece explores the popular, Iowa-based website Your Mom not for the effect it has on young participants, but as a thriving example of citizen journalism, in which the members of a community get involved in reporting on it. It is one of the first articles that recognizes (even if indirectly) youth media as a prototype for the budding citizen journalism movement.

The following article originally appeared on Wiretap.
On July 13, a large auditorium at the Washington Convention Center lit by 19th-century chandeliers wasn’t hosting the usual crowd of elderly men in gray suits. For the first time in 30 years of liberal organizing, Campus Progress brought together over 600 progressive twenty-something activists to the capital of political establishment.
Recovering from the steady stream of recent defeats, liberals argue over the future of the Democratic Party. And as with the recent AFL-CIO split, there is no agreement on winning strategy in sight. Progressives blame the centrist ’90s and want to move away from corporate sponsors to pulling together a new, lower- and middle-class majority of Americans. But beltway moderates can’t seem to abandon conservative-leaning elites.
Political differences aside, progressive grassroots organizers seem to agree on one point. While the left has been more effective in local activism, including college campuses, when it comes to national politics the right dominates the agenda more than ever.
Over the past 30 years, right-wing groups poured over $35 million annually to college campuses. Even though a vast majority of students identify themselves as being closer to the left, for every progressive publication on college campus, there are two conservative ones. When it comes to affecting the national agenda, conservative groups have been more effective at organizing students, in large part, through campus publications.
But it looks like this trend could be changing. Campus Progress—a division of the Center for American Progress—is the only group in the U.S. today that financially supports progressive publications on college campuses. It currently sponsors 14 progressive publications, with plans to hit 50 next year, helps students bring progressive speakers to their schools and organizes national editorial conference calls. Student publishers receive money for printing, training and mentorship, says Elana Berkowitz, editor of the Campus Progress online magazine.
Their first annual conference was an attempt to gather hundreds of small student groups to kick off a national debate about progressive agenda.
In a day-long, free conference, students heard from Democratic moderates like President Bill Clinton and the first female White House press secretary Dee Dee Myers. There were also more-progressive writers and organizers, such as author Thomas Frank, Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation and Stephanie Nyombayire—a young activist from Rwanda working to bring more visibility to the ongoing atrocities in Darfur, Sudan. Morning panels attempted to define progressive values while afternoon workshops focused on strategic training shared by veteran organizers.
A young woman in her early twenties in a flamboyant dress and pink high heels confidently introduces herself to everyone at the table. She is an intern from Americans for Peace Now. Her head shook violently as she laid out her carefully crafted talking points with a confident, at times deafening voice. I put a finger on my ear to hear my soft-spoken neighbor. Rob Cobbs is a full-time student at Amherst College and a board chair for Massachussets Student PIRG (Public Interest Research Group). He spends more than 30 hours a week on political organizing. Jamia Wilson, a veteran pro-choice activist with maturity well beyond her 24 years, has thoughtful insight on any topic that comes up. This group of students is every college professor’s dream&@8212;motivated, smart and articulate.
With 4.7 million more 18 to 24 year-old votes cast in 2004 than 2000, these young leaders are also becoming every progressive politician’s dream—from Democrats to Greens.

Tom Friedman vs. Naomi Klein?

The week after the conference, Campus Progress heard a few loud boo’s on its blog inspired by Sam Graham-Felsen’s article in The Nation. Critiquing the conference for its lack of more radical viewpoints from the progressive circles, he pointed out that no one challenged President Bill Clinton on the war in Iraq or his welfare policies.
Most Campus Progress bloggers debated the merits of a national conference that brings together more centrist students, who typically vote for the Democrats, and more radical participants, who vote for the Greens or even start their own parties. Do they have enough in common, or is this a waste of time, a project doomed to failure once they get down to policy?
Activist Jamia Wilson thinks the conference was a good idea and was impressed by the diversity of students, but she doesn’t see much future in compromising with the more centrist views. “I’m sick of the appeasement sentiment. Even though I truly appreciate Campus Progress, there is definitely this lean toward moderate, centrist propaganda. The Republican Party is winning and they never appeased us, ever,” she argued. For Wilson, the issues discussed were too safe—poverty, social security, sex education—compared to tougher turf like gay rights, a woman’s right to choose, or affirmative action.
Gilowen Jenkins, 21, a senior at the University of Massachusetts, recently changed his more radical stance and moved to the center for strategic purposes. “I feel that to get some positive progressive change we need to get the seats of power back. It’s okay to dream—we need visionaries—but you have to be realistic about the nature of power in this country and how to get it,” he explained.
Berkowitz, editor of Campus Progress, views these disagreements as an asset of the progressive movement, “At the core, Campus Progress students share a number of values—a commitment to economic opportunity and justice, maintaining civil liberties and reproductive freedoms, pursuing a thoughtful, effective and humane foreign policy.” She views finding common ground as key to effective progressive activism. “Students who don’t always see eye to eye on every political issue will have to work together to create a movement and to make change on their campuses and in their communities.”

Don’t Just Organize, Mobilize

Most students spoke with conviction and clarity about their values and goals. There were savvy strategists, organizers, and promoters. But as with the rest of progressive community, student organizers often fail to mobilize larger groups of people beyond their immediate activist circles.
This is where Campus Progress comes in. The group helps some of the most effective progressive student activists go beyond short-term mobilization on one issue—voting once a year, getting their schools to divest from Wal-Mart, or stopping a polluting plant—to becoming long-term, strategic organizers who stay in touch with non-activists in their communities on a day-to-day basis.
Through campus publications, these organizers can connect big political issues—like global warming—to the personal lives of people who are working too many jobs, taking too many classes or watching too much TV. The success of long-term organizing that can shape national agenda requires engagement of our less politically active neighbors.
John Wilson of the Independent Press Association, which that also supports college publications, comments, “If you look at any category of activism—the number of student organizations, the number of campus protests and events, the number of students actively organizing—progressives far outnumber conservatives. But the current model of progressive activism on campuses is a huge number of disparate organizations focusing on their own issues.”
Campus Progress can be that missing tool for all progressive students—radical or centrist—to effectively communicate with their base, build broader coalitions and win bigger battles. David Halperin, director of Campus Progress adds, “Trying to force conformity is doomed to failure. But we can get smarter about presenting our case and figuring out when it’s best to come together.”
For one day, for the first time in 30 years of progressive organizing, there were students from Ivy League schools and community colleges, students from Tennessee and Florida—all seeing each other as part of a cohesive whole. Public service seemed like a hip thing to do. And most participants were challenged to focus on what the progressive movement agrees on and stands for, rather than what it is that divides the various factions. For a movement that prides itself for its inclusion and diversity, I say it’s a good thing.
Kristina Rizga edits WireTap, AlterNet’s youth-oriented section.

Continue reading Speaking of the Future Establishment

Youth Media Reporter previously ran an in-brief item about the teen journalist who went undercover to see how far the army would go to get one more soldier. His “sting operation” drew national attention (and criticism). An Editor & Publisher article takes a closer look at how the young reporter got his story and the aftermath of his investigation. The piece provides a good way to get teens talking about what constitutes ethical reporting.

Foundations have a penchant for collaborations. As Children’s PressLine program director Katina Paron told Youth Media Reporter, foundations “love partnerships because it saves on resources for them.” But finding the right group to work with isn’t easy, especially when many nonprofits want to partner only with organizations sharing their own beliefs and missions.
But that’s going about it all wrong, argues Michael C. Gilbert on Nonprofit Online News. “The great secret of successful collaboration is this: The only agreement you have to have is on what you are all going to do,” he says. “You have to agree on actions. You don’t have to bring the visions and missions of your organizations into alignment…The less tightly we hold to our narrow organizational identities … the sooner we will forge the movements and coalitions needed to truly save the world from the forces of fear and greed.”

“Today’s publishers are eager to work with teen authors, because they want to reach younger readers,” says the Christian Science Monitor, quoting the author of a book for teens looking to publish. Every now and then a teenager emerges from the woodwork with a blockbuster book, most recently Nigerian-born British author Helen Oyeyemi. At 18, Oyeyemi penned the acclaimed novel The Icarus Girl. But a youthful sensation doesn’t always lead to a literary career, the Monitor warns.

Back in 1995, I began my youth-media career at Teen Voices magazine, passionate about empowering girls to write and publish. I volunteered at the Boston-based nonprofit while working as an editorial assistant at New Age Journal (now Body + Soul). Instead of fact-checking articles about psychic healing, I wanted to be working with teens full-time. So I told Alison Amoroso, the founder of Teen Voices, that I would leave my job and raise enough money to pay myself the same salary (then $18K) to come on board.
I was 24 years old and had no clue what the term “development officer” meant. High donors, special events, and direct-mail solicitations were all new to me. But I was driven. I would do whatever it took to get paid for working at Teen Voices.
And then I learned that fundraising for youth media is incredibly tough.
After three years of sending out countless solicitations, pulling all-nighters on grant applications, planning art auctions, attending high donor “teas,” and writing lengthy grantee reports for foundations that each gave us a whopping $3,000, I was burned out. I had raised enough money to grow the staff but not enough to live on without help from a credit card. More important, I could not raise enough to take a break from fundraising. I learned that at a small, grassroots nonprofit, everyone is a development officer, and it often takes away from the important work you’re trying to do.
Fast forward 10 years. I now work at Al Gore’s Current TV, a for-profit company that empowers young people to create TV they want to watch. I also publish Ypulse, a blog where I write daily commentary about Generation Y for media and marketing professionals. Working in both commercial and noncommercial media, I’ve seen how the two can benefit each other.
Youth media can offer commercial media what it’s always looking for: authentic content and access to real youth culture. Commercial media, in turn, can help distribute youth media and potentially provide it with the kind of funding that doesn’t require you to write a 10-page grant proposal.
But until recently, I hadn’t come across any marketers embracing youth media in this way.
Then, searching for interesting links to post on Ypulse, I discovered my idea was being realized in Europe: Levi’s Antidote, a new marketing initiative in Europe, is using youth-made media to reach young consumers. Their model, while not yet perfect, signifies an important step towards developing mutually beneficial relationships between brands and youth media.
Here’s how Antidote works. Lateral, a London-based digital marketing agency that Levi’s hired, finds groups with teen-produced articles, photos, and other forms of media that Levi’s can post on their website or print in a zine distributed throughout the company’s European stores. If Lateral picks up a story from Teen Voices on girl grafitti artists, for instance, that story could be read by any teen shopping at Levi’s.
A youth media organization can also receive small amounts of money from Lateral if they host live events that Levi’s wants to be associated with. (For instance, Levi’s Antidote funded an exhibition of young artists in Liverpool.)
Antidote’s press release explains that Levi’s wants to provide “young people with the tools to pursue their passion and share it with others.” Because the media and events backed by Antidote are the brainchildren of young people, the press release continues, the marketing campaign is “naturally led by what matters to young people and how they choose to express it, and as such almost a pioneering model: A major brand that voluntarily gives the lead to its consumers!”
Of course, Antidote is not only about youth empowerment. Levi’s hopes that when young consumers know the brand supports their interests, they will view Levi’s positively. It’s a win-win for both Levi’s and the youth media projects involved: Levi’s gets a positive image; the youth media groups get their media distributed by Levi’s and can receive funding for events.
In the United States, the brand that has come closest to Levi’s approach in Europe is Toyota’s Scion. Hoping to identify itself with young urban trendsetters, Scion has a record label that promotes underground artists and runs regular promotions to identify up-and-coming DJs and producers. It also publishes a monthly magazine that, according to a recent Pacific News Service article, “features some of the hottest underground hip-hop heads from the Bay Area to London.”
As is, neither Scion nor Antidote is the answer to youth media fundraising; we all know that sponsoring a few events and distributing youth media isn’t the same as funding an operating budget. And of course, a lot of idealists are leery of working with corporations for fear of selling out, being censored, or being used to market products without receiving just compensation. (Helene Venge, digital marketing manager at Levi’s Europe, openly acknowledged there are parameters around the kinds of content Antidote will and will not distribute: alternative music or street art is cool, while overt drug use or nationalism is not.)
Though flawed, these models are still worth watching. If these early ventures between brands and youth media prove successful, a new funding model could be born, one that could bring dollars to both corporations and nonprofits.
If Levi’s had offered to distribute Teen Voices content in Antidote’s print zine in its stores, would we have done it? You bet.
Now if they would only consider funding operating expenses in exchange for the content with no strings attached…
Anastasia Goodstein is the publisher of Ypulse.com, which provides a space where people working in commercial teen media and nonprofit youth media can come together. She is also the manager of viewer content at Current TV.

Continue reading The Antidote to Fundraising?

For mentoring programs to work, they need to be done right. For instance, studies show that a mentor who ends the mentoring relationship too soon can actually harm a young person. It’s one of the reasons that finding ways to retain staff is crucial at youth media organizations. Mentoring.org now offers a (free and downloadable) tool kit, Elements of Effective Practice, with templates and advice to help organizations ensure quality mentoring.